To Evaluate My Assignment Please, Click Here
Name – Dhiman Nisha A.
Name – Dhiman Nisha A.
Roll No – 19
Paper name – Post colonial literature
Study – M.A
SEM - 3
Topic – Orientalism Edward said analysis
Guided by-Dr. dilip barad
Submitted to –
Department of English Maharaja Krishnakumar sinhji Bhavnagar University
About Author
Edward Said was a born 1 November 1935 and died 25 Sep 2003. He
was a Palestinian American literary theorist and
famous critic theorist in Post colonial literature. He was professor in English
literature. Book ‘‘Orientalism’’ was
published in 1997. Edward was cultural critic and author. Influenced by
the imperialism and colonialism of the 19th century. Western people became interested in the
natives and the cultures of Western colonies. Orientalism is all about
imaginative or problem of society, political, religion and that is a material
age of Orientlism. Edward said generally means to Orientalism are mental
exercise and mental archival. If they can have most important of the ‘‘Orient’’
or ‘‘Occident’’ it’s connected with east or west part of the world.
Edward said challenged the concept of Orientalism or different are East or West.
What is post colonialism?
What is Orientalism?
Edward said about
Orientalism
“The scoop of
Orientalism”
` The term “Orientalism” derived from
Latin word east. Orientalism is irrational, power of structure, it is more
important of the view. There are most important theme White man burden. It’s linguistic of the way.
Edward Said is challenged the European or American people thinking, political
issue or Orientalism. Two theme followed by Knowledge and power.
Here is a very difficult task of the Arabic or European people but they have
all about structure are important aspect of the Way. Culture, power, political,
intellectual it’s dominated strategy. Orientalism divided in two part of “Ours” and “Their” are
consequence of the way. Orientalism culture studies are east or west is
connected with “Orient” or “Occident”. Orient is Middle East specialists.
What
is Orient?
What is Occident?
Different between “Orient” and “Occident”
The opposite term “Orient” means “East” or
“Occident” means “West”. It is a
literary and formal word for Western. There are relation between power and
domination. Orient mean west or they discuss in English authority of western
world. It is an antonym of Occidental. It is an antonym of Oriental. “Orient”
or “occident” it’s sector creation.
Orient politically,
structure, imperialism different between “The East is East or West is West.” We can
say that the orient is stereotypes and sophisticated abstractions.
Differentiation creates problems especially political and other problem are
white man or Muslim people. Orientalism expresses the culture, ideology,
economically its stereotype of the style and imagination. Here comes ‘Hegemony’,
that means we have to be exceptional and if we do not then we becomes
hegemonic.
Edward Said argument
Orientalism
is and does not simply represent a considerable dimension of modern, Political,
intellectual culture and such had less to do with the orient than it does with
“our” world. The Orientalism divided the part by Civil- Uncivil, East-West,
Occident-Orient, White, Muslim, Our- there are discuss of the European culture.
Edward Said
“My Orientalism is Middle East or Islam”
Orientalist structure and Restructure
Second chapter of Structure
or Restructure are Points the slight change in the attitude of the Europeans
towards the Orientals. Artists as well
as scholars were already described as "Orientalists" in the 19th century, especially in France.
European people views are different, the Oriental presented them
color of Orientalist and other is perception. The structure of orient is nothing more than a structure
of lies or the myths which, were the truth about them to be told, would simply
blow away. History, method, political and academic is a more important of the
oriental. Qualification is that ideas, culture, and histories cannot
seriously be understood. Human make history, human make their agency it your
life.
“Men make their own history”
The Anglo-French-American experience
of the Arab and Islam it is the intellectual authority of the Oriental or west
culture. Western said- it was their
duty to civilize people or order to achieve their goal and they had to colonize
and rule the orients. European is relationship with power and institution. Immediately
upon doing that an India, Japan, china and other sections of regions were not
important because one could discuss Europe's experience of the Near Orient. Orientalism
is not just idea or valuable because it material and they are connected with
power. Anglo-French and American orientalism was a kind of intellectual
authority within the western culture. Silvestre de saucy and Ernest Renan
worker are Orientalism a new dimension. Saucy thing is very different or they
information are useful for or the prejudice that was inherited orientalism. Renan
was works important are science, philosopher and idea of orientalism.
Edward said:
“Structure or Restructure for studying authority here are what can be called strategic
location and describing the authors position and strategic after culture at
large”.
Orientalism Now
The
last chapter of orientalism is changing the politician in 20th century. Early orientalism didn’t traditional and
interacted, And
new orients lived with them as if they were one of them. The interchange between the
academic and the more or less imaginative meaning of orientalism is a constant
one. There appreciated life style, new trend,
language or culture but they have other followed by role. Previous or future of
orientalism was that culture/religion of orientalism. Thus, Islam
was called mohammadism and Christ was called Christianity. Domination has been so powerful. Islamic
orient has had to be center of attention.
Islamic oriental did not enjoy this
time because Islamic as a week religion, different rule or they have not
expected the new generation. Gibb or Massignon was the most famous Islamic oriental of this time. After
World War 1 the centre of oriental’s changed from Europe to USA. End of World
War 2, all the Europeans colonies were lost and it was believed that
there no more “Orientals” and “Occidents” they not really.
Edward’s Quotes
Conclusion
Edward said that Orientalisms
are knowledge or power restrict. There are power dominant structures or
constricting of the way. It is not
political subject matter. He
shows the European-Western Imperial power along with the confused feelings of
the Oriental countries towards the Western power. Orientalism is all about
geography, intellectualism, history and politically corporate of the way.
Orientalism published in 1978
ReplyDelete